Jack Pinnington Jones vs Sebastian Gima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: In recent matches, Jones has a slightly higher success rate on second serves at 42.82% compared to Gima's 42.15%.
• Return Game Comparison: When returning second serves, Gima performs better, winning 50.62% of points, while Jones wins 48.2%.
• First Serve Return: Gima is again stronger with a 30.93% success rate against first serves, compared to Jones's 28.74%.
• Handling Pressure: Jones has an edge in saving breakpoints, at 54.29%, outperforming Gima's 49.11%.
• Overall Match Performance: Over the last year, Jones has been more successful, winning 65.31% of matches, compared to Gima's 52.94%.
• Surface Proficiency: Clay suits Jones best with a 71% win rate, whereas Gima excels on Hard courts at 60%.
• Player Level & Experience: Jones competes mostly at higher-level events, winning 62.86% at Challengers/ITF, while Gima plays more Futures/Satellites, winning 55.36%.
• Head-to-Head Record: In their only previous encounter, Gima defeated Jones, winning two out of three sets on clay.
• Extreme Pressure Performance: Gima won their only tiebreak against Jones and has a better deciding set record in head-to-head play.
• Opponent Quality: Jones generally faces opponents with an average rank of 293.67, whereas Gima faces higher-ranked competitors at 107.19 on average.
• Deciding Set Records: In general play, Jones wins more deciding sets (65%) compared to Gima (43%).
• Breakpoint Conversion: Recently, Gima is more effective at converting breakpoints, achieving a 35.82% conversion rate versus Jones's 31.13%.

Editorial Prediction (July 29, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performance trends highlights a balanced matchup. Jones's stronger second serve performance offers a slight edge, though Gima's ability to return serve effectively may neutralize this advantage.

Jones appears more comfortable in high-pressure situations, saving breakpoints at a better rate. However, Gima's superior record in their only head-to-head match and decisive set encounters could foreshadow another win.

Their past match on clay favored Gima, but Jones's consistent success across recent matches cannot be dismissed. Given Gima's higher exposure to tougher opponents and better breakpoint conversion rate, these elements could tip scales in real-time scenarios.

Despite Jones's outstanding recent record, Gima's head-to-head victory and adaptability under high pressure make them the more likely winner for the upcoming match.